Abstract
Background: Research consistently suggests nurses working in mental health settings are more likely to be assaulted than nurses in other settings. Aims: Belated recognition of the issue in terms of social policy (Elston et al. 2006) has been accompanied by an as yet unexamined contest between confl icting 'frames' of the problem, which this paper seeks to make transparent. Method: Frame analysis. Results: Two distinct 'master' frames are discussed: the 'individualizing' and the 'co-creationist'. Conclusions: The influence of these frames has influenced the nature of responses to the problem but the recent dominance of the individualizing frame is being challenged by the emergence, or perhaps re-emergence, of co-creationism.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 310-320 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | International Journal of Social Psychiatry |
| Volume | 56 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2010 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- aggression
- discourse
- policy
- prevention
- psychiatric nurses
- psychiatry
- violence in the workplace
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Re-framing the problem of workplace violence directed towards nurses in mental health services in the UK : a work in progress'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver