Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Real-world impact of pembrolizumab availability for deficient mismatch repair metastatic colorectal cancer

  • Matthew Loft
  • , Vanessa Wong
  • , Suzanne Kosmider
  • , Rachel Wong
  • , Jeremy Shapiro
  • , Wei Hong
  • , Ross Jennens
  • , Jeanne Tie
  • , Susan Caird
  • , Simone Steel
  • , Belinda Lee
  • , Louise Nott
  • , Muhammad Adnan Khattak
  • , Stephanie Lim
  • , Geoffrey Chong
  • , Theresa Hayes
  • , Craig Underhill
  • , Sue Anne McLachlan
  • , Natalie Rainey
  • , Catherine Dunn
  • Peter Gibbs
  • Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research
  • Western Health
  • University of Melbourne
  • Ballarat Health Services
  • Box Hill Hospital
  • Monash University
  • Epworth HealthCare
  • Cabrini Health
  • Peter Maccallum Cancer Centre
  • Gold Coast University Hospital
  • Griffith University Queensland
  • Peninsula Private Hospital
  • Northern Health
  • Royal Hobart Hospital
  • Fiona Stanley Hospital
  • Edith Cowan University
  • SWSLHD
  • South West Healthcare
  • Border Medical Oncology, Australia
  • St. Vincent's Hospital Melbourne
  • Queensland Health

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Immunotherapy has emerged as a standard treatment for deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Pembrolizumab became widely available as a first-line (1L) option in Australia following the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) listing in August 2021. The uptake of new treatment options can be lengthy. Methods: The Treatment of Recurrent and Advanced Colorectal Cancer mCRC registry data at participating Australian sites was analysed from January 2015 (when MMR testing became routine). 1L treatment of dMMR cancers was compared with pre- and post-PBS funding. Results: Out of 2819 patients, 2344 (83%) had known MMR status. Of these, 162 (7%) were dMMR, which was associated with older age (median age 69 vs 63 years, P = 0.001), a right-side primary (68% vs 31%, P < 0.001) and a BRAF V600E mutation (49% vs 11%, P < 0.001). Prior to August 2021, 85 out of 117 (73%) patients with dMMR received 1L treatment: 63 out of 85 (74%) chemotherapy and 20 out of 85 (24%) immunotherapy. Following approval, 39 out of 45 (87%) received 1L treatment and 39 out of 39 (100%) pembrolizumab. Of the patients 75 years and older, a significantly higher proportion of patients were treated with any 1L therapy post-PBS listing (89% vs 60%, P = 0.036). Conclusion: Previously reported associations of dMMR were observed. The higher-than-expected proportion of patients with dMMR is likely driven by the inclusion of older patients in this real-world study. Many patients were able to access immunotherapy prior to PBS listing, potentially through trials or access programs. Early uptake of pembrolizumab following PBS listing has been high, and this effective and well-tolerated option has increased the proportion of elderly patients receiving active therapy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)41-46
Number of pages6
JournalInternal Medicine Journal
Volume55
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2025
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Royal Australasian College of Physicians.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • deficient mismatch repair/dMMR
  • immunotherapy
  • metastatic colorectal cancer
  • pembrolizumab

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Real-world impact of pembrolizumab availability for deficient mismatch repair metastatic colorectal cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this