TY - JOUR
T1 - Real world outcomes of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer : a multicentre observational study
AU - Parsonson, Andrew Ohyama
AU - Connolly, Elizabeth
AU - Lee, Mark
AU - Hruby, George
AU - Sandroussi, Charbel
AU - Merrett, Neil
AU - Samra, Jaswinder
AU - Mittal, Anubhav
AU - Tse, Regina
AU - Grimison, Peter
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.
PY - 2021/11
Y1 - 2021/11
N2 - Background: Neoadjuvant therapy may increase the likelihood of complete (R0) resection for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. The optimal approach is unknown and differs amongst treatment centres. Methods: We identified patients with biopsy-proven borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma who commenced neoadjuvant therapy between January 2012 and June 2019 at three centres in Sydney, Australia. Patterns of care and outcomes of varying approaches were examined. Results: Forty-eight patients were identified. Median age was 66 years (range: 41-84). Staging included endoscopic ultrasound in 98%, PET-CT scan in 77%, laparoscopy in 46%. Neoadjuvant regimens used were a combination of chemotherapy and chemo-radiation (58%), chemotherapy alone (13%) and chemoradiation alone (29%). Radiologic complete or partial response occurred in 33% and progression in 25%. Complete macroscopic surgical resection was achieved in 50%, and R0 resection in 38%. At median follow-up of 15 months, the 1-year and 2-year overall survival was 75% and 63% respectively, and the 1-year and 2-year progression-free survival was 50% and 29% respectively. Significant predictors of macroscopic resectability were radiologic response (p = 0.005) but not addition of radiotherapy to chemotherapy (OR 0.87, p = 0.81). Predictors of overall survival included baseline Ca19.9 level (p = 0.04) and a trend to the use of systemic chemotherapy (HR 0.51, p = 0.07), but not use of radiotherapy (HR 0.70, p = 0.47). Conclusion: There is high variability in staging and neoadjuvant approaches for borderline resectable pancreas cancer. Despite aggressive neoadjuvant therapies, R0 resection and prolonged survival are uncommon. The incremental benefit of neoadjuvant radiotherapy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy was not demonstrated in this observational study.
AB - Background: Neoadjuvant therapy may increase the likelihood of complete (R0) resection for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. The optimal approach is unknown and differs amongst treatment centres. Methods: We identified patients with biopsy-proven borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma who commenced neoadjuvant therapy between January 2012 and June 2019 at three centres in Sydney, Australia. Patterns of care and outcomes of varying approaches were examined. Results: Forty-eight patients were identified. Median age was 66 years (range: 41-84). Staging included endoscopic ultrasound in 98%, PET-CT scan in 77%, laparoscopy in 46%. Neoadjuvant regimens used were a combination of chemotherapy and chemo-radiation (58%), chemotherapy alone (13%) and chemoradiation alone (29%). Radiologic complete or partial response occurred in 33% and progression in 25%. Complete macroscopic surgical resection was achieved in 50%, and R0 resection in 38%. At median follow-up of 15 months, the 1-year and 2-year overall survival was 75% and 63% respectively, and the 1-year and 2-year progression-free survival was 50% and 29% respectively. Significant predictors of macroscopic resectability were radiologic response (p = 0.005) but not addition of radiotherapy to chemotherapy (OR 0.87, p = 0.81). Predictors of overall survival included baseline Ca19.9 level (p = 0.04) and a trend to the use of systemic chemotherapy (HR 0.51, p = 0.07), but not use of radiotherapy (HR 0.70, p = 0.47). Conclusion: There is high variability in staging and neoadjuvant approaches for borderline resectable pancreas cancer. Despite aggressive neoadjuvant therapies, R0 resection and prolonged survival are uncommon. The incremental benefit of neoadjuvant radiotherapy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy was not demonstrated in this observational study.
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/1959.7/uws:61344
U2 - 10.1111/ans.17151
DO - 10.1111/ans.17151
M3 - Article
SN - 1445-1433
VL - 91
SP - 2447
EP - 2452
JO - ANZ Journal of Surgery
JF - ANZ Journal of Surgery
IS - 11
ER -