TY - JOUR
T1 - Reassessing the paradigm of economics : bringing positive economics back into the normative framework (book review)
AU - Mariyani-Squire, Edward
PY - 2012
Y1 - 2012
N2 - Mosini makes an interesting, even intriguing case for the claim that Friedman provided ‘the methodological basis of the neoliberal paradigm’ (p. 97). Her case is well worth reflecting upon and engaging with. As should be evident, I am not convinced that the case she makes is incontestable. In brief, I think F53 is too contradictory and ambiguous and Friedman’s applied work is too methodologically diverse to sustain the claim to a single, unified framework for neoliberalism or anything else (cf. Helm 1984; Stanley 1985). I believe it is more accurate to say that neoliberalism has no genuine methodological basis; instead its proponents merely make opportunistic rhetorical claims to objectivity and scientific status when necessary. That said, Reassessing the Paradigm of Economics provides economists, both orthodox and heterodox, with much food for thought and constructs an original and challenging argument which specialists in methodology should grapple with.
AB - Mosini makes an interesting, even intriguing case for the claim that Friedman provided ‘the methodological basis of the neoliberal paradigm’ (p. 97). Her case is well worth reflecting upon and engaging with. As should be evident, I am not convinced that the case she makes is incontestable. In brief, I think F53 is too contradictory and ambiguous and Friedman’s applied work is too methodologically diverse to sustain the claim to a single, unified framework for neoliberalism or anything else (cf. Helm 1984; Stanley 1985). I believe it is more accurate to say that neoliberalism has no genuine methodological basis; instead its proponents merely make opportunistic rhetorical claims to objectivity and scientific status when necessary. That said, Reassessing the Paradigm of Economics provides economists, both orthodox and heterodox, with much food for thought and constructs an original and challenging argument which specialists in methodology should grapple with.
KW - books
KW - economics
KW - reviews
UR - http://handle.uws.edu.au:8081/1959.7/516090
UR - http://search.informit.com.au/documentSummary;dn=554227339308911;res=IELBUS
M3 - Article
SN - 1035-3046
VL - 23
SP - 123
EP - 134
JO - The Economic and Labour Relations Review
JF - The Economic and Labour Relations Review
IS - 2
ER -