Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Recalibration and validation of the SCORE risk chart in the Australian population: The AusSCORE chart

  • Lei Chen
  • , Andrew M. Tonkin
  • , Lynelle Moon
  • , Paul Mitchell
  • , Annette Dobson
  • , Graham Giles
  • , Michael Hobbs
  • , Patrick J. Phillips
  • , Jonathan E. Shaw
  • , David Simmons
  • , Leon A. Simons
  • , Anthony P. Fitzgerald
  • , Guy De Backer
  • , Dirk De Bacquer
  • Monash University
  • Australian Institute of Health and Welfare
  • The University of Sydney
  • University of Queensland
  • Cancer Council Victoria
  • University of Western Australia
  • Queen Elizabeth Hospital
  • Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute
  • University of Melbourne
  • University of Cambridge
  • University of New South Wales
  • University College Cork
  • Ghent University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

40 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Development of a validated risk prediction model for future cardiovascular disease (CVD) in Australians is a high priority for cardiovascular health strategies. Design: Recalibration of the SCORE (Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation) risk chart based on Australian national mortality data and average major CVD risk factor levels. Methods: Australian national mortality data (2003-2005) were used to estimate 10-year cumulative CVD mortality rates for people aged 40-74 years. Average age-specific and sex-specific levels of systolic blood pressure, total cholesterol and prevalence of current smoking were generated from data obtained in eight Australian large-scale population-based surveys undertaken from the late 1980s. The SCORE risk chart was then recalibrated by applying hazard ratios for 10-year CVD mortality obtained in the SCORE project. Discrimination and calibration of the recalibrated model was evaluated and compared with that of the original SCORE and Framingham equations in the Blue Mountains Eye Study in Australia using Harrell's c and Hosmer-Lemeshow χ2 statistics, respectively. Results: An Australian risk prediction chart for CVD mortality was derived. Among 1998 Blue Mountains Eye Study participants aged 49-74 years with neither CVD nor diabetes at baseline, the Harrell's c statistics for the Australian risk prediction chart for CVD mortality were 0.76 (95% confidence interval: 0.69-0.84) and 0.71 (confidence interval: 0.62-0.80) in men and women, respectively. The corresponding Hosmer-Lemeshow χ2 statistics, the measure of calibration, were 2.32 (P=0.68) and 7.43 (P=0.11), which were superior to both the SCORE and Framingham equations. Conclusion: This new tool provides a valid and reliable method to predict risk of CVD mortality in the general Australian population.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)562-570
Number of pages9
JournalEuropean Journal of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation
Volume16
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2009
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Blue Mountains Eye Study
  • Cardiovascular disease
  • Mortality
  • Risk prediction
  • Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Recalibration and validation of the SCORE risk chart in the Australian population: The AusSCORE chart'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this