Recent developments

Cameron Stewart, John Coggon, Bill Madden, Tina Cockburn

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    As in many jurisdictions, of ongoing controversy in English jurisprudence are questions concerning expert legal testimony. In cases where shaken baby syndrome is alleged, this controversy is particularly pertinent, as findings of fact can rely exclusively on the professed opinions of medical experts. In criminal cases, concerns are especially acute. There are fears of juries’ failure to understand the evidence, or to assess what aspects of presented evidence are relevant; issues of how to resolve conflict between different experts’ opinion; and questions of how successfully juries might weigh the possibility of uncertain causation. Thus considerable attention has focused on the Court of Appeal’s decision in Henderson v R [2010] EWCA Crim 1269, handed down by Moses LJ, which offers guidance on the procedures that courts should follow in such cases.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)277-282
    Number of pages6
    JournalJournal of Bioethical Inquiry
    Volume7
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2010

    Keywords

    • medical ethics
    • shaken baby syndrome

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Recent developments'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this