Abstract
The following remarks do not aim to positively say that intentionality is, as we would say, more modestly, contribute to a review of the fundamental problems with this notion, by asking the question that intentionality must be for us to talk about, that is to say, for a descriptive speech can give a decision on it. This issue, borrowed from a recent book by John McDowell, Having a view of the world, in which context we must first try to reposition. In the final text of this book, McDowell comments of reading Wilfrid Sellars had proposed the Critique of Pure Reason, and significant returns on this occasion he reproaches himself and to Kant a few years earlier, in Mind and World. McDowell then comes to oppose, on a model that he recalls very strongly the traditional distinction between oratio recta and oratio obliqua, our usual way of talking about the world on one side, and on the other, a properly philosophical way (McDowell also called "transcendental") to use the speech to analyze this relationship to the world that ties in our ordinary use of language.
Translated title of the contribution | Straightness and intentionally skew the Oratio phenomenological : cross notes McDowell, Brentano and Husserl |
---|---|
Original language | French |
Pages (from-to) | 109-128 |
Number of pages | 20 |
Journal | Bulletin d'Analyse Phenomenologique |
Volume | 6 |
Issue number | 8 |
Publication status | Published - 2010 |
Keywords
- intentionality
- discourse
- rectitude