Red flag! : challenges for online peer review : a case study from an undergraduate course at an Australian university

Roger Dawkins; Navin Doloswala; George Karliychuk

Red flag! : challenges for online peer review : a case study from an undergraduate course at an Australian university

Roger Dawkins, Navin Doloswala, George Karliychuk

Research output: Chapter in Book / Conference Paper › Conference Paper

Abstract

Research notes the pedagogical benefits of peer review. This presentation outlines the technological challenges involved in one implementation of a peer review process in an undergraduate course, and it makes a start on best-practice guidelines for future iterations. The implementation involved two academics and a lead educational technologist at the University. Technologies used were Blackboard, Panopto, and Turnitin PeerMark.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	Teaching & Learning Conference ANZ 2018, Brisbane, Qld, 28-31 August 2018
Publisher	Blackboard
Number of pages	1
Publication status	Published - 2018
Event	Teaching & Learning Conference ANZ - Duration: 1 Jan 2018 → …

Conference

Conference	Teaching & Learning Conference ANZ
Period	1/01/18 → …

Keywords

education, higher
educational technology
peer review
pedagogy

Cite this

@inproceedings{92305b09fbfe4888b37ff861318d1650,

title = "Red flag! : challenges for online peer review : a case study from an undergraduate course at an Australian university",

abstract = "Research notes the pedagogical benefits of peer review. This presentation outlines the technological challenges involved in one implementation of a peer review process in an undergraduate course, and it makes a start on best-practice guidelines for future iterations. The implementation involved two academics and a lead educational technologist at the University. Technologies used were Blackboard, Panopto, and Turnitin PeerMark.",

keywords = "education, higher, educational technology, peer review, pedagogy",

author = "Roger Dawkins and Navin Doloswala and George Karliychuk",

year = "2018",

language = "English",

booktitle = "Teaching & Learning Conference ANZ 2018, Brisbane, Qld, 28-31 August 2018",

publisher = "Blackboard",

note = "Teaching & Learning Conference ANZ ; Conference date: 01-01-2018",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Red flag! : challenges for online peer review : a case study from an undergraduate course at an Australian university

AU - Dawkins, Roger

AU - Doloswala, Navin

AU - Karliychuk, George

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Research notes the pedagogical benefits of peer review. This presentation outlines the technological challenges involved in one implementation of a peer review process in an undergraduate course, and it makes a start on best-practice guidelines for future iterations. The implementation involved two academics and a lead educational technologist at the University. Technologies used were Blackboard, Panopto, and Turnitin PeerMark.

AB - Research notes the pedagogical benefits of peer review. This presentation outlines the technological challenges involved in one implementation of a peer review process in an undergraduate course, and it makes a start on best-practice guidelines for future iterations. The implementation involved two academics and a lead educational technologist at the University. Technologies used were Blackboard, Panopto, and Turnitin PeerMark.

KW - education, higher

KW - educational technology

KW - peer review

KW - pedagogy

UR - http://handle.westernsydney.edu.au:8081/1959.7/uws:47749

M3 - Conference Paper

BT - Teaching & Learning Conference ANZ 2018, Brisbane, Qld, 28-31 August 2018

PB - Blackboard

T2 - Teaching & Learning Conference ANZ

Y2 - 1 January 2018

ER -

Red flag! : challenges for online peer review : a case study from an undergraduate course at an Australian university

Abstract

Conference

Keywords

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this