Refining the meaning of the "collective" in collective guilt : harm, guilt, and apology in Australia

Craig McGarty, Ana-Maria Bliuc

Research output: Chapter in Book / Conference PaperChapter

Abstract

Barkan's chapter on Australia in his book, The guilt of nations, is a rich source of insights. There is, however, one important way that this quote fails to capture important ideas that we explore in this chapter. Specifically, we propose that collective guilt in Australia cannot be understood by assuming that a uniform ideology that can be summarized neatly as racist, sexist, xenophobic, optimistic, or patriotic is widely shared in Australian society. Rather, there are fault lines within Australian society that reflect social conflict. The social conflict is not so much between racial or ethnic groups, but is about these groups. Collective guilt in Australia has very much to do with an ongoing debate that lends itself extremely well to an intergroup social psychological analysis. In this chapter, we consider the political context and social psychology of collective guilt in Australia and discuss some empirical research on this issue. In conclusion, we suggest a theoretical resolution to the paradoxical relationship between social identification and collective guilt.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationCollective Guilt: International Perspectives
EditorsNyla R. Branscombe, Bertjan Doosje
Place of PublicationU.K.
PublisherCambridge University Press
Pages112-129
Number of pages18
ISBN (Electronic)9781139114004
ISBN (Print)9780521817608
Publication statusPublished - 2004

Keywords

  • guilt
  • social conflict
  • Australia

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Refining the meaning of the "collective" in collective guilt : harm, guilt, and apology in Australia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this