Regression from early GDM to normal glucose tolerance and adverse pregnancy outcomes in the treatment of booking gestational diabetes mellitus study

TOBOGM Research Group, David Simmons, Jincy Immanuel, William M. Hague, Helena Teede, Christopher J. Nolan, Michael J. Peek, Jeff R. Flack, Mark McLean, Vincent W. Wong, Emily J. Hibbert, Alexandra Kautzky-Willer, Jürgen Harreiter, Helena Backman, Emily Gianatti, Arianne Sweeting, Viswanathan Mohan, N. Wah Cheung

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare pregnancy outcomes among women with a normal oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) before 20 weeks' gestation (early) and at 24-28 weeks' gestation (late) (no gestational diabetes mellitus, or No-GDM), those with early GDM randomized to observation with a subsequent normal OGTT (GDM-Regression), and those with GDM on both occasions (GDM-Maintained). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Women at <20 weeks' gestation with GDM risk factors who were recruited for a randomized controlled early GDM treatment trial were included. Women with treated early GDM and late GDM (according to the World Health Organization's 2013 criteria) were excluded from this analysis. Logistic regression compared pregnancy outcomes. RESULTS: GDM-Regression (n = 121) group risk factor profiles and OGTT results generally fell between the No-GDM (n = 2,218) and GDM-Maintained (n = 254) groups, with adjusted incidences of pregnancy complications similar between the GDM-Regression and No-GDM groups. CONCLUSIONS: Women with early GDM but normal OGTT at 24-28 weeks' gestation had pregnancy outcomes that were similar to those of individuals without GDM. Identifying early GDM likely to regress would allow treatment to be avoided.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2079-2084
Number of pages6
JournalDiabetes care
Volume47
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2024

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Regression from early GDM to normal glucose tolerance and adverse pregnancy outcomes in the treatment of booking gestational diabetes mellitus study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this