Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Regulated autonomy or autonomous regulation? : collective bargaining and academic workloads in Australian universities

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

43 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The recommendations of the 'Bradley Review' of higher education in Australia identified a clear need for examination of the academic labour market and the limited attractiveness of academia as a profession. Reasons for the lack of attractiveness include increased academic workloads, as evidenced by larger class sizes and staff-student ratios. This article examines the relevant academic workload clauses from collective bargaining agreements, operating in a cross-section of 'public' universities in Australia. Our findings challenge a common belief that workload clauses in university collective agreements are regulating academics' autonomy as they are largely unregulated and hence left to the domain of managerial prerogative. We suggest that this situation serves the needs of university managers, but not necessarily the needs of students, staff and policy makers.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)137-148
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Higher Education Policy and Management
Volume32
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 8 - Decent Work and Economic Growth
    SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth

Keywords

  • education, higher
  • university lecturers

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Regulated autonomy or autonomous regulation? : collective bargaining and academic workloads in Australian universities'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this