Relationship between personal psychological capitals, stress level, and performance in marathon runners

Emily L. L. Sin, Chi-ngan Chow, Roy T. H. Cheung

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Marathon runners experience different levels of stress from their performance, which may vary across different people. Objectives: This study sought to examine if stress levels could be predicted by running performance and personal psychological capitals, including optimism and self-efficacy levels in marathon finishers. It also determined the contribution of each component in a stress prediction model. Methods: An online questionnaire and comprised validated scales were used to measure runners’ performance, perceived stress levels, and personal psychological capitals. Results: A positive correlation between runner performance and perceived stress level (rs = 0.256, p = 0.019) was found, while the personal psychological capitals were negatively correlated to stress levels (rs= -0.580, p < 0.001) and (rs = -0.618, p < 0.001) respectively. Perceived stress levels were best predicted by personal psychological capitals (β = -0.322 - -0.393, p = 0.001), but not running performance. Conclusion: Our findings suggested that psychological factors affect stress levels the most, and marathon runners with a lower performance were more prone to stress than those who perform better.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)67-72
Number of pages6
JournalHong Kong Physiotherapy Journal
Volume33
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Keywords

  • marathon running
  • optimism
  • performance
  • questionnaires
  • running
  • stress (psychology)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Relationship between personal psychological capitals, stress level, and performance in marathon runners'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this