TY - JOUR
T1 - Reliability and convergent validity of self-reported physical activity questionnaires for people with mental disorders : a systematic review and meta-analysis
AU - de Oliveira Tavares, Vagner Deuel
AU - Galvão-Coelho, Nicole Leite
AU - Firth, Joseph
AU - Rosenbaum, Simon
AU - Stubbs, Brendon
AU - Smith, Lee
AU - Vancampfort, Davy
AU - Schuch, Felipe Barreto
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Purpose: To examine the reliability and convergent validity of self-reported questionnaires (SRQs) to measure physical activity (PA). Methods: Systematic review with meta-analysis. The validity and reliability of SRQs to assess PA in people with mental disorders (January 20, 2020). Random-effects meta-analyses were performed pooling (1) test-retest correlations or (2) the convergent validity between the SRQs and objective measures (eg, accelerometry). Associations were provided in r values with the 95% confidence interval. Methodological quality was assessed. Results: A total of 9 unique studies (N = 1344; 40.5% females) were included. The authors found a moderate correlation test-retest reliability for PA SRQs in the assessment of vigorous PA (r =.69 [.38 to.85]; P =.001), moderate to vigorous PA (r =.63 [.25 to.84]; P =.003), moderate PA (r =.63 [.39 to.79]; P =.001), and good correlation total PA (r =.75 [.37 to.92]; P =.001). The SRQs have moderate correlations with objective measures for moderate to vigorous PA (r =.25 [.18 to.32]; P =.0001) and total PA (r =.47 [.28 to.62]; P =.005), a poor correlation for moderate PA (r =.18 [.03 to.36]; P =.047), and no correlation with vigorous PA (r =.06 [−.10 to.22]; P =.440). Conclusion: Current evidence indicates that SRQs are reliable over time to assess moderate, vigorous, and total PA levels and valid when assessing moderate PA.
AB - Purpose: To examine the reliability and convergent validity of self-reported questionnaires (SRQs) to measure physical activity (PA). Methods: Systematic review with meta-analysis. The validity and reliability of SRQs to assess PA in people with mental disorders (January 20, 2020). Random-effects meta-analyses were performed pooling (1) test-retest correlations or (2) the convergent validity between the SRQs and objective measures (eg, accelerometry). Associations were provided in r values with the 95% confidence interval. Methodological quality was assessed. Results: A total of 9 unique studies (N = 1344; 40.5% females) were included. The authors found a moderate correlation test-retest reliability for PA SRQs in the assessment of vigorous PA (r =.69 [.38 to.85]; P =.001), moderate to vigorous PA (r =.63 [.25 to.84]; P =.003), moderate PA (r =.63 [.39 to.79]; P =.001), and good correlation total PA (r =.75 [.37 to.92]; P =.001). The SRQs have moderate correlations with objective measures for moderate to vigorous PA (r =.25 [.18 to.32]; P =.0001) and total PA (r =.47 [.28 to.62]; P =.005), a poor correlation for moderate PA (r =.18 [.03 to.36]; P =.047), and no correlation with vigorous PA (r =.06 [−.10 to.22]; P =.440). Conclusion: Current evidence indicates that SRQs are reliable over time to assess moderate, vigorous, and total PA levels and valid when assessing moderate PA.
UR - https://hdl.handle.net/1959.7/uws:65363
U2 - 10.1123/JPAH.2020-0312
DO - 10.1123/JPAH.2020-0312
M3 - Article
SN - 1543-3080
VL - 18
SP - 109
EP - 115
JO - Journal of Physical Activity and Health
JF - Journal of Physical Activity and Health
IS - 1
ER -