Abstract
Outcomes measures are commonly derived from post-discharge recidivism, readmission, and mortality rates but information about common outcomes across admission is scant. We determined whether reliable and clinically significant change in risk-related need, behavior, functioning, and symptoms occurred during admission by analysing routinely collected HoNOS-secure data (N = 418). We calculated between-group differences in baseline scores and rates of change, the proportion of patients for whom change was reliable, and, of those, the proportion whose scores fell by a clinically significant margin. Reliable change was demonstrated for 4.8% and 5.7% of patients on the HoNOS-secure scale and security scale respectively, and that change was rarely clinically significant. In a context in which services rarely report on routinely collected data for a range of outcomes, we found that HoNOS-secure captured little of any clinical change that may have occurred. Further research should determine whether the HoNOS-secure is a suitable tool for routine outcomes reporting.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 161-171 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | International Journal of Forensic Mental Health |
| Volume | 16 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2017 |
Keywords
- mental health
- mental health services
- psychiatric hospital patients
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Reliable and clinically significant change in outcomes for forensic mental health inpatients : use of the HoNOS-secure'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver