Reliable or risky? : competing arguments framing home education's regulation

Chris Krogh, Giuliana Liberto

Research output: Chapter in Book / Conference PaperChapter

Abstract

The global and growing phenomenon of home education is regulated differently in different countries and different states. Where is it legal the regulatory burden on home educators ranges from low to moderate to high. A range of commentators, including home educators, work to shape the frames through which home education is understood and subsequently regulated. Using an illustrative case study, this chapter shows that regulation impacts on child wellbeing and that home educators take different motivational postures based on a range of factors, of which their relationship with the regulator is one. The degree to which regulators cultivate a cooperative relationship is proposed as a critical factor in developing a positive regulatory environment. Co-production of home education regulations, as was previously undertaken in Tasmania, Australia, is presented as an effective and more acceptable approach to regulation. This is recommended as a model of practice to be undertaken in other settings.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationGlobal Perspectives on Home Education in the 21st Century
EditorsRebecca English
Place of PublicationU.S.
PublisherIGI Global
Pages229-249
Number of pages21
ISBN (Electronic)9781799866831
ISBN (Print)9781799866817
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2021

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Reliable or risky? : competing arguments framing home education's regulation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this