Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Remotely delivered physiotherapy for musculoskeletal conditions is cost saving for the health system and patients: economic evaluation of the REFORM randomised trial

  • Alison J. Hayes
  • , Hannah G. Withers
  • , Joanne V. Glinsky
  • , Jackie Chu
  • , Matthew D. Jennings
  • , Ian Starkey
  • , Rachel Parmeter
  • , Max Boulos
  • , Jackson J. Cruwys
  • , Kitty Duong
  • , Ian Jordan
  • , David Wong
  • , San Trang
  • , Maggie Duong
  • , Hueiming Liu
  • , Tara E. Lambert
  • , Joshua R. Zadro
  • , Catherine Sherrington
  • , Christopher Maher
  • , Barbara R. Lucas
  • Deborah Taylor, Manuela L. Ferreira, Lisa A. Harvey
  • The University of Sydney
  • New South Wales Health
  • Blacktown Hospital
  • SWSLHD
  • Hornsby-Ku-Ring-Gai Hospital
  • Liverpool Hospital
  • Bankstown-Lidcombe Hospital
  • Royal North Shore Hospital

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Questions: Is remotely delivered physiotherapy cost saving when compared with usual face-to-face physiotherapy as typically provided in a public hospital outpatient setting? Is remotely delivered physiotherapy cost-effective? Design: Economic evaluation embedded within a randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial using a health system plus patient perspective. Participants: Patients with musculoskeletal conditions presenting to Sydney public hospitals for physiotherapy treatment. Intervention: REFORM was a randomised controlled trial comparing remotely delivered physiotherapy with usual care provided in an outpatient setting. Remotely delivered physiotherapy involved one face-to-face physiotherapy session in conjunction with text messages, phone calls and an individualised exercise program delivered through an ‘App’. Outcome measures: The economic evaluation included the Patient Specific Functional Scale at 6 weeks in the cost-minimisation and cost-effectiveness analyses, and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) at 26 weeks in the cost-utility analysis. Health system and patient resource use were derived from patient self-report. Results: Costs per participant over 6 weeks were AUD $742 for remotely delivered physiotherapy and $910 for face-to-face physiotherapy, with a mean cost difference of –$168 (95% CI –$339 to $1). There was a 98% probability of remotely delivered physiotherapy being cost saving within the non-inferiority margin of the Patient Specific Functional Scale, and an 88% probability of being dominant to face-to-face physiotherapy (less costly and more effective). There was a 51% probability of being cost-effective at a nominal $50,000/QALY threshold. Conclusion: Moving people with musculoskeletal conditions to a remote model of physiotherapy care is potentially cost saving for health systems and patients, without compromising health outcomes when compared with currently provided public hospital care. Trial registration: ACTRN12619000065190.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)179-184
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Physiotherapy
Volume71
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2025
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Australian Physiotherapy Association

Keywords

  • Cost-effectiveness
  • Economic evaluation
  • Musculoskeletal conditions
  • Rehabilitation
  • Telehealth

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Remotely delivered physiotherapy for musculoskeletal conditions is cost saving for the health system and patients: economic evaluation of the REFORM randomised trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this