Reply to Adams et al. : empirical versus process-based approaches to modeling temperature responses of leaf respiration

Mary A. Heskel, Owen K. Atkin, Odhran S. O'Sullivan, Peter Reich, Mark G. Tjoelker, Lasantha K. Weerasinghe, Aurore Penillard, John J. G. Egerton, Danielle Creek, Keith J. Bloomfield, Jen Xiang, Felipe Sinca, Zsofia R. Stangl, Alberto Martinez-de la Torre, Kevin L. Griffin, Chris Huntingford, Vaughan Hurry, Patrick Meir, Matthew H. Turnbull

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Using an empirical approach, we report that the slope of the short-term log-transformed leaf respiration (R)– temperature (T) curves declines with increasing leaf T in a manner that is uniform across biomes (1); the results have utility for modeling carbon fluxes in terrestrial biosphere models (TBMs). The use of an empirical approach reflects the fact that, despite advances in understanding of factors regulating R (2–4) and its T-response (5), basic information on key determinants of R remains lacking, hindering development of a process-based model with utility for TBMs.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)E5996-E5997
Number of pages2
JournalProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Volume113
Issue number41
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Keywords

  • climatic changes
  • ecosystems
  • leaf respiration
  • leaves
  • temperature

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Reply to Adams et al. : empirical versus process-based approaches to modeling temperature responses of leaf respiration'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this