Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Reported contributors to communication vulnerability for adult patients in critical care

  • Laura Istanboulian
  • , Amy Freeman-Sanderson
  • , Anthony Gilding
  • , Praisy Rampogu
  • , Kelly M. Smith
  • , Karen Soldatić
  • University of Toronto
  • Michael Garron Hospital
  • University of Technology Sydney
  • Royal Prince Alfred Hospital
  • University of New South Wales
  • Monash University
  • Toronto Metropolitan University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)
2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: Patients admitted to the intensive care unit experience communication vulnerability due to patient-factors including the use of an advanced airway to facilitate mechanical ventilation. Communication vulnerability puts patients at risk for adverse safety events and breakdowns in care. A more complete understanding of communication vulnerability that includes socio-relational and contextual factors can expose opportunities to improve patient communication and safety in the intensive care unit. Aim: To expand our understanding of patient communication vulnerability in the adult intensive care unit using a disability rights approach. Methods: We used a qualitative descriptive methodology including semi-structured interviews and paired content analysis. Between January – April 2024, 22 participants were interviewed including 11 professionally diverse healthcare providers, 7 family members, and 4 patient survivors from a community academic hospital in Toronto, Canada. Interviews were audio recorded and transcribed. Findings: Patient, family, and healthcare provider participants described often converging patient-, socio-relational-, environmental-, and structural- factors that contribute to patient communication vulnerability in the adult intensive care unit. In addition to patient factors, reported socio-relational factors included insufficient clinician communication training. Reported environmental factors included insufficent communication tool accessibility, lack of patient privacy, lighting and noise levels. Reported structural factors of communication vulnerability included family inclusion and infection control policies. Conclusions: This study presents patient, family, and healthcare provider reported contributors to patient communication vulnerability in the intensive care unit beyond patient-factors. Identifying socio-relational, environmental and structural related factors contributing to communication vulnerability provides multiple opportunities to improve patient communication practices and safety for adults in the intensive care unit. Implications for Clinical Practice: Using a disability rights approach to understanding patient communication vulnerability in the adult intensive care unit exposed socio-relational and contextual opportunities for system-based practice change. These include systemic availabilty of communication tools and conducting environmental scans of lighting and noise-levels.

Original languageEnglish
Article number104231
Number of pages8
JournalIntensive and critical care nursing : the official journal of the British Association of Critical Care Nurses
Volume92
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2026
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 10 - Reduced Inequalities
    SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities

Keywords

  • Communication
  • Critical care nursing
  • Disability
  • Patient safety
  • Qualitative

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Reported contributors to communication vulnerability for adult patients in critical care'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this