Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Reporting guideline for the use of Generative Artificial intelligence tools in MEdical Research: the GAMER Statement

  • Xufei Luo
  • , Yih Chung Tham
  • , Mauro Giuffrè
  • , Robert Ranisch
  • , Mohammad Daher
  • , Kyle Lam
  • , Alexander Viktor Eriksen
  • , Che Wei Hsu
  • , Akihiko Ozaki
  • , Fabio Ynoe De Moraes
  • , Sahil Khanna
  • , Kuan Pin Su
  • , Emir Begagić
  • , Zhaoxiang Bian
  • , Yaolong Chen
  • , Janne Estill
  • , GAMER Working Group
  • , Gemma Sharp
  • Lanzhou University
  • National University of Singapore
  • Duke-NUS Medical School
  • Yale University
  • University of Trieste
  • University of Potsdam
  • Hôtel Dieu de France
  • Imperial College London
  • Odense University Hospital
  • University of Otago
  • Otago Polytechnic
  • Jyoban Hospital of Tokiwa Foundation
  • Queen's University Kingston
  • Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN
  • China Medical University Taichung
  • Cantonal Hospital Zenica
  • Hong Kong Baptist University
  • Chinese EQUATOR Centre
  • WHO Collaborating Centre for Guideline Implementation and Knowledge Translation
  • University of Geneva
  • Monash University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

30 Citations (Scopus)
41 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Objectives: Generative artificial intelligence (GAI) tools can enhance the quality and efficiency of medical research, but their improper use may result in plagiarism, academic fraud and unreliable findings. Transparent reporting of GAI use is essential, yet existing guidelines from journals and institutions are inconsistent, with no standardised principles. Design and setting: International online Delphi study. Participants: International experts in medicine and artificial intelligence. Main outcome measures: The primary outcome measure is the consensus level of the Delphi expert panel on the items of inclusion criteria for GAMER (Rreporting guideline for the use of Generative Artificial intelligence tools in MEdical Research). Results: The development process included a scoping review, two Delphi rounds and virtual meetings. 51 experts from 26 countries participated in the process (44 in the Delphi survey). The final checklist comprises nine reporting items: general declaration, GAI tool specifications, prompting techniques, tool's role in the study, declaration of new GAI model(s) developed, artificial intelligence-assisted sections in the manuscript, content verification, data privacy and impact on conclusions. Conclusion: GAMER provides universal and standardised guideline for GAI use in medical research, ensuring transparency, integrity and quality.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)390-400
Number of pages11
JournalBMJ Evidence-Based Medicine
Volume30
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2025
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ Group.

Keywords

  • Epidemiology
  • Quality of Health Care

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Reporting guideline for the use of Generative Artificial intelligence tools in MEdical Research: the GAMER Statement'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this