TY - JOUR
T1 - Residual stresses in cold-formed steel sections
T2 - an overview of influences and measurement techniques
AU - Mutafi, Ayad
AU - Irwan, J. M.
AU - Yidris, Noorfaizal
AU - Alshalif, Abdullah Faisal
AU - Saif, Yazid
AU - Abdulrahman, Hamdi
AU - Mutaafi, Ala
AU - Al-Ashmori, Yasser Yahya
AU - Amran, Mugahed
AU - Maureira-Carsalade, Nelson
AU - Avudaiappan, Siva
PY - 2025/2
Y1 - 2025/2
N2 - Cold-formed steel (CFS) members offer significant advantages over hot-rolled sections, primarily due to their high strength-to-weight ratio and versatility in forming various cross-sectional shapes. These attributes make CFS an efficient choice for design and construction. This paper reviews current design methods for CFS, focusing on the impact of initial imperfections. It also examines various techniques for measuring residual stress in CFS sections, including analytical, experimental, and numerical approaches. The study concludes that while analytical methods are effective, they become complex when accounting for material anisotropy. Laboratory techniques provide reliable measurements but are limited in detecting through-thickness residual stresses. Numerical approaches offer comprehensive insights but require further validation across different material and geometric configurations. The paper highlights the need for advanced analytical models, improved laboratory methods, and expanded numerical techniques to address existing knowledge gaps in residual stress assessment for CFS structures.
AB - Cold-formed steel (CFS) members offer significant advantages over hot-rolled sections, primarily due to their high strength-to-weight ratio and versatility in forming various cross-sectional shapes. These attributes make CFS an efficient choice for design and construction. This paper reviews current design methods for CFS, focusing on the impact of initial imperfections. It also examines various techniques for measuring residual stress in CFS sections, including analytical, experimental, and numerical approaches. The study concludes that while analytical methods are effective, they become complex when accounting for material anisotropy. Laboratory techniques provide reliable measurements but are limited in detecting through-thickness residual stresses. Numerical approaches offer comprehensive insights but require further validation across different material and geometric configurations. The paper highlights the need for advanced analytical models, improved laboratory methods, and expanded numerical techniques to address existing knowledge gaps in residual stress assessment for CFS structures.
KW - Cold-formed steel
KW - Geometrical imperfection
KW - Initial imperfection
KW - Material imperfection
KW - Residual strain
KW - Residual stress
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85215832200&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.finmec.2025.100306
DO - 10.1016/j.finmec.2025.100306
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85215832200
SN - 2666-3597
VL - 18
JO - Forces in Mechanics
JF - Forces in Mechanics
M1 - 100306
ER -