Response to comment on "Unexpected reversal of C3 versus C4 grass response to elevated CO2 during a 20-year field experiment"

Peter B. Reich, Sarah E. Hobbie, Tali D. Lee, Melissa A. Pastore

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Wolf and Ziska suggest that soil and species attributes can explain an unexpected 20-year reversal of C3-C4 grass responses to elevated CO2. This is consistent with our original interpretation; however, we disagree with the assertion that such explanations somehow render our results irrelevant for questioning a long-standing paradigm of plant response to CO2 based on C3-C4 differences in photosynthetic pathway.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbereaau1300
Number of pages2
JournalScience
Volume361
Issue number6402
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Keywords

  • biomass
  • carbon dioxide
  • grasses
  • nitrogen cycle
  • photosynthesis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Response to comment on "Unexpected reversal of C3 versus C4 grass response to elevated CO2 during a 20-year field experiment"'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this