TY - JOUR
T1 - Response to Paul Apostolidis’s review of The Politics of Operations
T2 - Excavating Contemporary Capitalism
AU - Mezzadra, Sandro
AU - Neilson, Brett
PY - 2020/2
Y1 - 2020/2
N2 - We are pleased that the limitations that Paul Apostolidis finds in The Politics of Operations work at the level of metaphors rather than concepts. As Emile Benveniste (Problems in General Linguistics, 1971, p. 25) writes, metaphors are “a powerful factor in the enriching of concepts.” We intend the metaphor of “capital hitting the ground” as a means of enriching our concept of “operations of capital” or, at least, as a way of dramatizing one of its important moments—capital’s grappling with and enmeshment in “dense constellations of flesh and earth” (p. 3).
AB - We are pleased that the limitations that Paul Apostolidis finds in The Politics of Operations work at the level of metaphors rather than concepts. As Emile Benveniste (Problems in General Linguistics, 1971, p. 25) writes, metaphors are “a powerful factor in the enriching of concepts.” We intend the metaphor of “capital hitting the ground” as a means of enriching our concept of “operations of capital” or, at least, as a way of dramatizing one of its important moments—capital’s grappling with and enmeshment in “dense constellations of flesh and earth” (p. 3).
UR - https://go.openathens.net/redirector/westernsydney.edu.au?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592719004912
U2 - 10.1017/S1537592719004912
DO - 10.1017/S1537592719004912
M3 - Article
SN - 1537-5927
VL - 18
SP - 235
EP - 235
JO - Perspectives on Politics
JF - Perspectives on Politics
IS - 1
ER -