Response to Paul Apostolidis’s review of The Politics of Operations: Excavating Contemporary Capitalism

Sandro Mezzadra, Brett Neilson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

We are pleased that the limitations that Paul Apostolidis finds in The Politics of Operations work at the level of metaphors rather than concepts. As Emile Benveniste (Problems in General Linguistics, 1971, p. 25) writes, metaphors are “a powerful factor in the enriching of concepts.” We intend the metaphor of “capital hitting the ground” as a means of enriching our concept of “operations of capital” or, at least, as a way of dramatizing one of its important moments—capital’s grappling with and enmeshment in “dense constellations of flesh and earth” (p. 3).
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)235-235
Number of pages1
JournalPerspectives on Politics
Volume18
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2020

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Response to Paul Apostolidis’s review of The Politics of Operations: Excavating Contemporary Capitalism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this