Abstract
The continuing illegal detention of two Australians, David Hicks and Mamdouh Habib, together with more than 600 others in a United States military prison on Guantanamo Bay, Cuba raises crucial questions involving essential legal and democratic rights. The Australian Government has permitted the Bush administration to hold the pair as alleged 'enemy combatants' for three years without charge or trial. This is in violation of intemational law, including the Geneva Conventions on prisoners of war. The refusal of both the Howard Govemment and the Labor Opposition to challenge the US Govemment's actions has demonstrated their disdain for fundamental legal principles. This was highlighted early in 2004 when the Australian Labor Party (ALP) leader Mark Latham proposed the enactment of retrospective anti-terrorism laws to permit Hicks and Habib to be repatriated for trial in Australia.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Journal | Alternative law journal |
| Publication status | Published - 2004 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Australia
- United States
- detention of persons
- law and legislation
- legal status, laws, etc.
- prisoners of war
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Retrospective criminal laws and Guantanamo Bay : digging a deeper 'legal black hole''. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver