Abstract
Australia's policy of mandatory indefinite detention of those seeking asylum and arriving without valid documents has led to terrible human rights abuses and cumulative deterioration in health for those incarcerated. We argue that there is an imperative to research and document the plight of those who have suffered at the hands of the Australian government and its agents. However, the normal tools available to those engaged in health research may further erode the rights and well being of this population, requiring a rethink of existing research ethics paradigms to approaches that foster advocacy research and drawing on the voices of those directly affected, including those bestowed with duty of care for this population.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 48-56 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | American Journal of Bioethics |
| Volume | 10 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Feb 2010 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Australia
- asylum seekers
- health services accessibility
- mandatory detention
- patient advocacy
- research
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Returning to history : the ethics of researching asylum seeker health in Australia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver