Review of supply chain based embodied carbon estimating method : a case study based analysis

Muhandiramge Nimashi Navodana Rodrigo, Srinath Perera, Sepani Senaratne, Xiaohua Jin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Carbon estimating plays a vital role in the construction industry. The current focus on introducing zero-carbon construction projects reduces operational carbon, at the expense of Embodied Carbon (EC). However, it is important to reduce overall net carbon emissions. There are various methods to estimate carbon, but the accuracy of these estimates is questionable. This paper reviews a novel methodology, the Supply Chain based Embodied carbon Estimating Method (SCEEM), which was introduced recently to accurately estimate EC in construction supply chains. SCEEM is compared against existing EC estimating methods (Blackbook and eToolLCD) using a case study approach. It is also supplemented with a comprehensive literature review of existing EC methods. The EC values calculated using Blackbook and eToolLCD were mostly higher than SCEEM. Since SCEEM uses actual site data and considers first principles-based value addition method to estimate EC, it is considered accurate. The cross-case analysis revealed that SCEEM provided consistent results. Hence, SCEEM is recommended to accurately estimate EC of any type of project.
Original languageEnglish
Article number9171
Number of pages20
JournalSustainability
Volume13
Issue number16
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2021

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 by the authors. Li-censee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.

Open Access - Access Right Statement

© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Review of supply chain based embodied carbon estimating method : a case study based analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this