Rhythmic similarity effects in non-native listening?

Anne Cutler, Lalita Murty

    Research output: Chapter in Book / Conference PaperConference Paper

    Abstract

    ![CDATA[Listeners rely on native-language rhythm in segmenting speech; in different languages, stress-, syllable- or mora-based rhythm is exploited. This language-specificity effects listening to non-native speech, if native procedures are applied even though inefficient for the non-native language. However, speakers of two languages with similar rhythmic interpretation should segment their own and the other language similarly. This was observed to date only for related languages (English-Dutch; French-Spanish). We now report experiments in which Japanese listeners heard Telugu, a Dravidian language unrelated to Japanese, and Telugu listeners heard Japanese. In both cases detection of target sequences in speech was harder when target boundaries mismatched mora boundaries, exactly the pattern that Japanese listeners earlier exhibited with Japanese and other languages. These results suggest that Telugu and Japanese listeners use similar procedures in segmenting speech, and support the idea that languages fall into rhythmic classes, with aspects of phonological structure affecting listeners' speech segmentation.]]
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationProceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Barcelona 3-9 August 2003
    PublisherUniversitat Autonoma de Barcelona
    Number of pages4
    ISBN (Electronic)1876346485
    ISBN (Print)9781876346485
    Publication statusPublished - 2003
    EventInternational Congress of Phonetic Sciences -
    Duration: 17 Aug 2011 → …

    Conference

    ConferenceInternational Congress of Phonetic Sciences
    Period17/08/11 → …

    Keywords

    • speech perception
    • phonetics
    • language and languages
    • psycholinguistics
    • listening

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Rhythmic similarity effects in non-native listening?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this