Rigid vs non-rigid face and head motion in phone and tone perception

Denis K. Burnham, Jessica Reynolds, Guillaume Vignali, Sandra Bollwerk, Caroline Jones

    Research output: Chapter in Book / Conference PaperConference Paper

    4 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    ![CDATA[There is recent evidence that the visual concomitants, not only of the articulation of phones (consonants & vowels), but also of tones (fundamental frequency variations that signal lexical meaning in tone languages) facilitate speech perception. Analysis of speech production data from a Cantonese speaker suggests that the source of this perceptual information for tones involve rigid motion of the head rather than non-rigid face motion. A perceptual discrimination study was conducted using OPTOTRAK output in which rigid or non-rigid motion of the head could be presented independently, using two conditions: one in which words to be discriminated only differed in tone, and another in which they only differed in phone. The results suggest that non-rigid motion is the critical determinant for successful discrimination of phones, whereas both non-rigid and rigid motion are required for the discrimination of tones.]]
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationProceedings of Interspeech 2007
    PublisherCausal Productions
    Number of pages4
    Publication statusPublished - 2007
    EventInternational Speech Communication Association. Conference -
    Duration: 9 Sept 2012 → …

    Publication series

    Name
    ISSN (Print)1990-9772

    Conference

    ConferenceInternational Speech Communication Association. Conference
    Period9/09/12 → …

    Keywords

    • Cantonese dialects
    • head
    • movements
    • speech perception
    • tone (phonetics)
    • visual perception

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Rigid vs non-rigid face and head motion in phone and tone perception'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this