Risk factor, pattern, etiology and outcome in ischamic stroke patients with cancer : a nested case-control study

Yun Yun Zhang, Dennis Cordato, Qing Shen, Ai Zhen Sheng, Wai Tak Hung, Daniel K. Y. Chan

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Background: Coagulation disorders are seen in cancer patients, but it is not clear whether cancer predisposes stroke patients to unique characteristics. The aim of the study was to investigate risk factors, pattern, etiology and outcome in stroke patients with cancer. Methods: A retrospective review of all ischemic stroke (IS) patients with cancer (n = 56) admitted to Bankstown-Lidcombe Hospital, Sydney, Australia, between January 1999 and December 2004 was conducted and comparison made to age- and gender-matched noncancer IS patients admitted to the same hospital during the same period. Results: Vascular risk factors and stroke pattern were comparable in cancer and noncancer groups. Poststroke thrombotic episodes (myocardial infarction, deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary emboli) were more common in the cancer group than in the noncancer group (11 vs. 0%, p = 0.031). Depression was also more common in the cancer group than in the noncancer group (14 vs. 2%, p = 0.039). There was a tendency for more patients in the cancer group to die in hospital (30 vs. 14%, p = 0.078). Conclusions: Coagulation disorders were more likely to be seen in stroke cancer patients, and patients with cancer tended to have a higher in-hospital poststroke mortality. Larger sample size studies may identify further differences in the characteristics of stroke patients with cancer.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)181-187
    Number of pages7
    JournalCerebrovascular Diseases
    Volume23
    Issue number45353
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2007

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Risk factor, pattern, etiology and outcome in ischamic stroke patients with cancer : a nested case-control study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this