Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Risk status of Australia's alpine and subalpine ecosystems

  • Jessica A. Rowland
  • , Chloe Sato
  • , Tracey Regan
  • , David A. Keith
  • , José R. Ferrer-Paris
  • , Jayne Balmer
  • , James Camac
  • , Ken Green
  • , Jamie Kirkpatrick
  • , Calvin K. F. Lee
  • , Rebecca Lester
  • , John W. Morgan
  • , Keith McDougall
  • , Annette Muir
  • , Nicholas Murray
  • , Ella Plumanns-Pouton
  • , Emma Sumner
  • , Courtney Taylor
  • , Arn Tolsma
  • , Anikó Toth
  • Michael Traurig, Kate D. L. Umbers, Susanna Venn, Clare Vernon, Brodie Verrall, Matt White, Jennie Whinam, Genevieve Wright, Dick Williams, Emily Nicholson
  • Deakin University
  • Monash University
  • International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources
  • Parks Australia
  • State Government of Victoria
  • University of Melbourne
  • University of New South Wales
  • Department of Natural Resources and Environment Tasmania
  • Australian National University
  • University of Tasmania
  • The University of Hong Kong
  • La Trobe University
  • James Cook University Queensland
  • Global Ecology Unit CREAF-CSIC-UAB
  • Queensland Department of Environment and Science
  • the Environment and Water

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

20 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Alpine and subalpine ecosystems are threatened by changing climate and disturbance regimes because they exist under extreme geographical and climatic conditions. Understanding the threats to and risk status of alpine and subalpine ecosystems is vital to guide their conservation, inform monitoring programs and identify the relative impact of activities currently degrading these ecosystems. We applied the IUCN Red List of Ecosystems criteria to 15 alpine and subalpine ecosystem types across Australian mountains. We found that seven ecosystem types were classified as threatened and three as Near Threatened, together accounting for 83% of the alpine and subalpine region. The primary threats were climate change and associated changes in fire regimes. There were insufficient data to quantify the environmental or biotic integrity of six ecosystem types, and one ecosystem type was listed as Data Deficient overall. Our study highlighted key knowledge gaps in the integrity of alpine and subalpine systems that limited our capacity to reliably assess risk to these ecosystems. We recommend expanding on-ground monitoring of ecosystem integrity to improve understanding of risks, key threats and actions to mitigate them. To reduce risks to these ecosystems, climate change must be aggressively mitigated, collateral pressures from invasive plants and animals must be reduced, and critical knowledge gaps that will allow conservation action prioritisation must be quickly filled. These strategies should be co-ordinated, resourced and enacted urgently in cross-jurisdictional Alps-wide work plans.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere70214
Number of pages16
JournalAustral Ecology
Volume51
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2026

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 15 - Life on Land
    SDG 15 Life on Land

Keywords

  • alpine ecosystems
  • climate change
  • ecosystem risk assessment
  • subalpine ecosystems

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Risk status of Australia's alpine and subalpine ecosystems'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this