TY - JOUR
T1 - Robert Nichols in conversation with Kelly Aguirre, Phil Henderson, Cressida J. Heyes, Alana Lentin, and Corey Snelgrove
AU - Nichols, Robert
AU - Henderson, Phil
AU - Heyes, Cressida J.
AU - Aguirre, Kelly
AU - Lentin, Alana
AU - Snelgrove, Corey
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - As I finish Robert Nichols' Theft is Property! sitting in the fortress that "Australia" has become ever more apparently under COVID-19, residents of the Silwan neighborhood of Jerusalem are demolishing their own homes to avoid the USD6,000 fine imposed by the municipality if they did not do so in advance of the deadline set by an Israeli court. The calculated perversity of the primacy placed by European settler rule on the possessive is laid bare (Moreton-Robinson 2015). As in Sheikh Jarrah, Lyd, Haifa, and elsewhere around colonized Palestine, Palestinians' claims to occupancy are rejected by the enforcement of a prior claim bearing no more legitimacy than the fact that it is wielded by a burlier party, the Israeli state, backed by its strong-arm allies. Recalling this allows me to do two things: first, to note straight away the applicability of Nichols' highly detailed and meticulously historicized account of dispossession, as both an analytical tool for growing our understanding of Anglo-settler colonialism and for conceptualizing Indigenous practices of "expressive insurgency" (Nichols 2020: 159). Second, it permits me to place myself in relation to these discussions.
AB - As I finish Robert Nichols' Theft is Property! sitting in the fortress that "Australia" has become ever more apparently under COVID-19, residents of the Silwan neighborhood of Jerusalem are demolishing their own homes to avoid the USD6,000 fine imposed by the municipality if they did not do so in advance of the deadline set by an Israeli court. The calculated perversity of the primacy placed by European settler rule on the possessive is laid bare (Moreton-Robinson 2015). As in Sheikh Jarrah, Lyd, Haifa, and elsewhere around colonized Palestine, Palestinians' claims to occupancy are rejected by the enforcement of a prior claim bearing no more legitimacy than the fact that it is wielded by a burlier party, the Israeli state, backed by its strong-arm allies. Recalling this allows me to do two things: first, to note straight away the applicability of Nichols' highly detailed and meticulously historicized account of dispossession, as both an analytical tool for growing our understanding of Anglo-settler colonialism and for conceptualizing Indigenous practices of "expressive insurgency" (Nichols 2020: 159). Second, it permits me to place myself in relation to these discussions.
UR - https://hdl.handle.net/1959.7/uws:70587
UR - https://scholarworks.iu.edu/iupjournals/index.php/jwp/article/view/4925
M3 - Article
SN - 2474-1795
VL - 6
SP - 199
EP - 204
JO - Journal of World Philosophies
JF - Journal of World Philosophies
IS - 2
ER -