Routine oro/nasopharyngeal suction versus no suction in the delivery room

Jennifer A. Dawson, Peter G. Davis, Jann P. Foster

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    4 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This is the protocol for a review. The objectives are as follows: to evaluate the effect of routine oropharyngeal/nasopharyngeal suction compared to no suction on mortality and morbidity in newly born infants with and without meconium-stained liquor. Planned subgroup analyses: gestational age: term infants (≥ 37 weeks' gestation), preterm infants (28 to 36 weeks' gestation), very preterm infants (< 28 weeks' gestation); mode of delivery (vaginal birth; caesarean section); vigorous; non-vigorous infants; meconium-stained amniotic fluid; non-meconium-stained amniotic fluid; timing of suction (perineum-intrapartum; post-delivery); method of suction (bulb syringe; suction catheter).
    Original languageEnglish
    Article numberCD010332
    Pages (from-to)1-11
    Number of pages11
    JournalCochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2013

    Keywords

    • infants
    • newborn infants
    • oropharyngeal suction
    • resuscitation
    • systematic reviews (medical research)

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Routine oro/nasopharyngeal suction versus no suction in the delivery room'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this