Routine oro/nasopharyngeal suction versus no suction in the delivery room

Jennifer A. Dawson, Peter G. Davis, Jann P. Foster

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This is the protocol for a review. The objectives are as follows: to evaluate the effect of routine oropharyngeal/nasopharyngeal suction compared to no suction on mortality and morbidity in newly born infants with and without meconium-stained liquor. Planned subgroup analyses: gestational age: term infants (≥ 37 weeks' gestation), preterm infants (28 to 36 weeks' gestation), very preterm infants (< 28 weeks' gestation); mode of delivery (vaginal birth; caesarean section); vigorous; non-vigorous infants; meconium-stained amniotic fluid; non-meconium-stained amniotic fluid; timing of suction (perineum-intrapartum; post-delivery); method of suction (bulb syringe; suction catheter).
Original languageEnglish
Article numberCD010332
Pages (from-to)1-11
Number of pages11
JournalCochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Keywords

  • infants
  • newborn infants
  • oropharyngeal suction
  • resuscitation
  • systematic reviews (medical research)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Routine oro/nasopharyngeal suction versus no suction in the delivery room'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this