S-Adenosylmethionine (SAMe) monotherapy for depression : an 8-week double-blind, randomised, controlled trial

Jerome Sarris, Jenifer Murphy, Con Stough, David Mischoulon, Chad Bousman, Patricia MacDonald, Laura Adams, Sonia Nazareth, Georgina Oliver, Lachlan Cribb, Karen Savage, Ranjit Menon, Suneel Chamoli, Michael Berk, Chee H. Ng, Gerard J. Byrne

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Rationale: Dysregulation of the one carbon cycle is documented in depression. Thereby, S-adenosylmethionine (SAMe), a one-carbon cycle nutraceutical compound with a favourable side effect profile, has a theoretical rationale for efficacy. However, further controlled studies are required to confirm SAMe's efficacy. Objectives: To test the efficacy of SAMe versus placebo in unmedicated DSM-5 diagnosed (major depressive disorder) (MDD) patients with mild-to-moderate levels of depressive symptoms. Methods: We conducted an 8-week, double-blind, randomised controlled trial testing 800 mg/day of SAMe monotherapy versus placebo in 49 patients with MDD (Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale [MADRS] score 14-25) who were not currently taking antidepressants. One-carbon cycle biomarkers, brain-derived neurotropic factor (BDNF), and relevant single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were analysed as potential treatment moderators. Results: A clinically relevant differential reduction from baseline to week 8 of 3.76 points occurred on the primary outcome (MADRS) in favour of SAMe. This however was not significant (p = 0.13) on an adjusted linear mixed model, notwithstanding a medium to large effect size of 0.72. A high placebo response rate of 53% occurred (> 50% reduction on MADRS). Exploratory analyses showed that SAMe was however effective in reducing depression amongst participants with milder depression severity (MADRS ≤ 22, p = 0.045). Response was not moderated by BDNF, SNPs, or one-carbon cycle biomarkers, although increased folate concentrations were correlated with improved symptoms in the SAMe group (r = − 0.57, p = 0.026). The treatment was safe and well tolerated. Conclusions: Although a differential reduction in depression symptoms between groups was observed in favour of SAMe, the results of this pilot study were not statistically significant.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)209-218
Number of pages10
JournalPsychopharmacology
Volume237
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2020

Keywords

  • adenosylmethionine
  • antidepressants
  • depression_mental
  • functional foods

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'S-Adenosylmethionine (SAMe) monotherapy for depression : an 8-week double-blind, randomised, controlled trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this