Sapwood temperature gradients between lower stems and the crown do not influence estimates of stand-level stem COâ‚‚ efflux

William P. Bowman, Matthew H. Turnbull, David T. Tissue, David Whitehead, Kevin L. Griffin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Temperature plays a critical role in the regulation of respiration rates and is often used to scale measurements of respiration to the stand-level and calculate annual respiratory fluxes. Previous studies have indicated that failure to consider temperature gradients between sun-exposed stems and branches in the crown and shaded lower stems may result in errors when deriving stand-level estimates of stem CO 2 efflux. We measured vertical gradients in sapwood temperature in a mature lowland podocarp rain forest in New Zealand to: (1) estimate the effects of within-stem temperature variation on the vertical distribution of stem CO 2 efflux; and (2) use these findings to estimate stand-level stem CO 2 efflux for this forest. Large within-stem gradients in sapwood temperature ( 1.6±0.1 to 6.0 ± 0.5°C) were observed. However, these gradients did not significantly influence the stand-level estimate of stem CO 2 efflux in this forest (536 ± 42 mol CO 2 ha -1 day -1) or the vertical distribution of stem CO 2 efflux, because of the opposing effects of daytime warming and nighttime cooling on CO 2 efflux in the canopy, and the small fraction of the woody biomass in the crowns of forest trees. Our findings suggest that detailed measurements of within-stand temperature gradients are unlikely to greatly improve the accuracy of tree- or stand-level estimates of stem CO 2 efflux.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1553-1559
Number of pages7
JournalTree Physiology
Volume28
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2008

Keywords

  • Dacrydium cupressinum
  • carbon dioxide
  • respiration
  • sapwood
  • scaling
  • temperature
  • Scaling

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Sapwood temperature gradients between lower stems and the crown do not influence estimates of stand-level stem COâ‚‚ efflux'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this