Abstract
Different jurisdictions take different approaches to whether screening people before permitting access to assisted reproductive treatment (ART) is permissible, the criteria to be used, and whether such screening is provided for by law, guidelines or left to clinician discretion. This chapter examines the reasons for screening applicants for ART, the primary criteria used to screen applicants, and approaches to screening taken in the United States, the United Kingdom, and a number of states in Australia (as jurisdictions illustrative of where law, guidelines, or clinician discretion are practised). It examines whether screening is a useful tool that protects children.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Ethics, Law and Society. Volume V |
| Editors | Nicky Priaulx, Anthony Wrigley |
| Place of Publication | U.K. |
| Publisher | Ashgate Publishing |
| Pages | 257-278 |
| Number of pages | 21 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9781409419167 |
| Publication status | Published - 2013 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- reproductive technology
- child welfare
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Screening applicants for assisted reproduction : complexities and issues'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver