Self-handicapping and defensive pessimism : a model of self-protection from a longitudinal perspective

Andrew J. Martin, Herbert W. Marsh, Raymond L. Debus

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    109 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This research places self-handicapping and defensive pessimism (comprising defensive expectations and reflectivity) into a single conceptual and analytic framework that models the full self-protective process across time. Data on two occasions collected during studentsââ"šÂ¬Ã¢"žÂ¢ (n=328) first two years at university show: performance orientation positively predicts self-handicapping, defensive expectations, and reflectivity; task-orientation negatively predicts self-handicapping and defensive expectations and positively predicts reflectivity; uncertain personal control positively predicts defensive expectations and reflectivity; and an external attributional orientation positively predicts self-handicapping and defensive expectations. Although both self-handicapping and defensive expectations negatively affect academic outcomes, the negative effects of self-handicapping were more marked. In contrast to these counter-productive strategies, reflectivity had positive effects on academic engagement.
    Original languageEnglish
    Number of pages36
    JournalContemporary Educational Psychology
    Publication statusPublished - 2003

    Keywords

    • academic achievement
    • college students
    • defense mechanisms (psychology)
    • psychology
    • self-esteem
    • self-protective behavior

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Self-handicapping and defensive pessimism : a model of self-protection from a longitudinal perspective'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this