Self-handicapping and defensive pessimism : exploring a model of predictors and outcomes from a self-protection perspective.

Andrew J. Martin, Herbert W. Marsh, Raymond L. Debus

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    167 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The present study is centrally concerned with self-handicapping and defensive pessimism (comprising defensive expectations and reflectivity), the factors that predict these strategies, and the associations between these strategies and a variety of academic outcomes. Major findings are that task orientation negatively predicts both self-handicapping and defensive expectations and positively predicts reflectivity; uncertain personal control positively predicts defensive expectations, and to a lesser extent, self-handicapping; and an external attributional orientation is positively associated with self-handicapping, and to a lesser extent, defensive expectations. Both self-handicapping and defensive expectations are negatively associated with self-regulation and persistence, whereas reflectivity is positively associated with these outcomes. Students high in self-handicapping received lower end-of-year grades than did students low in self-handicapping and were less likely to be in attendance 1 year later.
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalJournal of Educational Psychology
    Publication statusPublished - 2001

    Keywords

    • academic achievement
    • defense mechanisms
    • pessimism
    • prediction
    • self preservation

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Self-handicapping and defensive pessimism : exploring a model of predictors and outcomes from a self-protection perspective.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this