TY - JOUR
T1 - Separation of concurrent broadband sound sources by human listeners
AU - Best, Virginia
AU - Van Schaik, André
AU - Carlile, Simon
PY - 2004/1
Y1 - 2004/1
N2 - The effect of spatial separation on the ability of human listeners to resolve a pair of concurrent broadband sounds was examined. Stimuli were presented in a virtual auditory environment using individualized outer ear filter functions. Subjects were presented with two simultaneous noise bursts that were either spatially coincident or separated (horizontally or vertically), and responded as to whether they perceived one or two source locations. Testing was carried out at five reference locations on the audiovisual horizon (0°, 22.5°, 45°, 67.5°, and 90° azimuth). Results from experiment 1 showed that at more lateral locations, a larger horizontal separation was required for the perception of two sounds. The reverse was true for vertical separation. Furthermore, it was observed that subjects were unable to separate stimulus pairs if they delivered the same interaural differences in time (ITD) and level (ILD). These findings suggested that the auditory system exploited differences in one or both of the binaural cues to resolve the sources, and could not use monaural spectral cues effectively for the task. In experiments 2 and 3, separation of concurrent noise sources was examined upon removal of low-frequency content (and ITDs), onset/offset ITDs, both of these in conjunction, and all ITD information. While onset and offset ITDs did not appear to play a major role, differences in ongoing ITDs were robust cues for separation under these conditions, including those in the envelopes of high-frequency channels.
AB - The effect of spatial separation on the ability of human listeners to resolve a pair of concurrent broadband sounds was examined. Stimuli were presented in a virtual auditory environment using individualized outer ear filter functions. Subjects were presented with two simultaneous noise bursts that were either spatially coincident or separated (horizontally or vertically), and responded as to whether they perceived one or two source locations. Testing was carried out at five reference locations on the audiovisual horizon (0°, 22.5°, 45°, 67.5°, and 90° azimuth). Results from experiment 1 showed that at more lateral locations, a larger horizontal separation was required for the perception of two sounds. The reverse was true for vertical separation. Furthermore, it was observed that subjects were unable to separate stimulus pairs if they delivered the same interaural differences in time (ITD) and level (ILD). These findings suggested that the auditory system exploited differences in one or both of the binaural cues to resolve the sources, and could not use monaural spectral cues effectively for the task. In experiments 2 and 3, separation of concurrent noise sources was examined upon removal of low-frequency content (and ITDs), onset/offset ITDs, both of these in conjunction, and all ITD information. While onset and offset ITDs did not appear to play a major role, differences in ongoing ITDs were robust cues for separation under these conditions, including those in the envelopes of high-frequency channels.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1642458111&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1121/1.1632484
DO - 10.1121/1.1632484
M3 - Article
C2 - 14759025
AN - SCOPUS:1642458111
SN - 0001-4966
VL - 115
SP - 324
EP - 336
JO - Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
JF - Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
IS - 1
ER -