Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Severity of oEsophageal Anastomotic Leak in patients after oesophagectomy: the SEAL score

  • Sander Ubels
  • , Moniek Verstegen
  • , Bastiaan Klarenbeek
  • , Stefan Bouwense
  • , Mark van Berge Henegouwen
  • , Freek Daams
  • , Marc J. van Det
  • , Ewen A. Griffiths
  • , Jan W. Haveman
  • , Joos Heisterkamp
  • , Renol Koshy
  • , Grard Nieuwenhuijzen
  • , Fatih Polat
  • , Peter D. Siersema
  • , Pritam Singh
  • , Bas Wijnhoven
  • , Gerjon Hannink
  • , Frans van Workum
  • , Camiel Rosman
  • , TENTACLE—Esophagus Collaborative Group
  • Neil Merrett
  • Radboud University Medical Center
  • Maastricht University
  • University of Amsterdam
  • ZGT hospital group
  • University of Birmingham
  • University of Groningen
  • Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital
  • Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
  • Catharina Hospital
  • Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital
  • Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust
  • Erasmus University Medical Center

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

17 Citations (Scopus)
22 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: Anastomotic leak (AL) is a common but severe complication after oesophagectomy. It is unknown how to determine the severity of AL objectively at diagnosis. Determining leak severity may guide treatment decisions and improve future research. This study aimed to identify leak-related prognostic factors for mortality, and to develop a Severity of oEsophageal Anastomotic Leak (SEAL) score. Methods: This international, retrospective cohort study in 71 centres worldwide included patients with AL after oesophagectomy between 2011 and 2019. The primary endpoint was 90-day mortality. Leak-related prognostic factors were identified after adjusting for confounders and were included in multivariable logistic regression to develop the SEAL score. Four classes of leak severity (mild, moderate, severe, and critical) were defined based on the risk of 90-day mortality, and the score was validated internally. Results: Some 1509 patients with AL were included and the 90-day mortality rate was 11.7 per cent. Twelve leak-related prognostic factors were included in the SEAL score. The score showed good calibration and discrimination (c-index 0.77, 95 per cent c.i. 0.73 to 0.81). Higher classes of leak severity graded by the SEAL score were associated with a significant increase in duration of ICU stay, healing time, Comprehensive Complication Index score, and Esophagectomy Complications Consensus Group classification. Conclusion: The SEAL score grades leak severity into four classes by combining 12 leak-related predictors and can be used to the assess severity of AL after oesophagectomy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)864-871
Number of pages8
JournalBritish Journal of Surgery
Volume109
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sept 2022

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Author(s). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of BJS Society Ltd.

Open Access - Access Right Statement

© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of BJS Society Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Severity of oEsophageal Anastomotic Leak in patients after oesophagectomy: the SEAL score'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this