Sexual conflict in mating strategies

Norman P. Li, Oliver Sng, Peter K. Jonason

Research output: Chapter in Book / Conference PaperChapter

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Men and women often come into conflict over issues of mating and sex. From an evolutionary perspective, we review the literature on attitudes toward casual sex, sexual intent, sexual harassment, rape, and deception of intent and mate value. Stemming from a key difference in parental investment (Trivers, 1972), men tend to be relatively eager for casual sexual partners, whereas women tend to be more cautious, requiring their sexual partners to be of higher quality or committed for a longer duration. This key difference, in turn, sets the stage whereby men and women negotiate their conflicted interests and enact their differing preferred mating strategies. As each side advances and protects its own reproductive interests, the other side's strategy is necessarily interfered with and conflict ensues, sometimes with severe outcomes.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe Oxford Handbook of Sexual Conflict in Humans
EditorsTodd K. Shackelford, Aaron T. Goetz
Place of PublicationU.K.
PublisherOxford University Press
Pages49-71
Number of pages23
ISBN (Print)9780195396706
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Keywords

  • sex (psychology)
  • sexual animosity

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Sexual conflict in mating strategies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this