Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Sexual harassment in schools : issues of identity and power : negotiating the complexities, contexts, and contradictions of this everyday practice

Research output: Chapter in Book / Conference PaperChapter

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Based on empirical qualitative research undertaken with students and teachers in both co-educational and single sex boys' and girls' high schools in Australia, this chapter explores the multiple, complex and contradictory nature of sexual harassment. This research reinforces the view of sexual harassment in schools as a widespread socio-cultural phenomenon, but it goes further to suggest that this practice is integral to the constitution and regulation of identities. It also examines the ways in which sexual harassment is utilised to constitute and regulate schooling practices and organisational hierarchies of power, such as those associated with authority. To understand sexual harassment, a feminist poststructuralist and discursive theoretical approach is incorporated in this discussion (Doughty, 2006; Foss & Rogers, 1994; Robinson, 200Sc; Wood, 1994), with a particular focus on the ideas and concepts of Michel Foucault.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationRethinking School Violence: Theory, Gender, Context
EditorsSue Saltmarsh, Kerry H. Robinson, Cristyn Davies
Place of PublicationU.S.A.
PublisherPalgrave Macmillan
Pages71-93
Number of pages23
ISBN (Print)9780230576698
Publication statusPublished - 2012

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Keywords

  • Australia
  • authority
  • gender
  • high schools
  • identity (philosophical concept)
  • power (social sciences)
  • sexual harassment
  • sexual harassment in education

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Sexual harassment in schools : issues of identity and power : negotiating the complexities, contexts, and contradictions of this everyday practice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this