Sexual signaling and immune function in the black field cricket Teleogryllus commodus

Jean M. Drayton, Matthew D. Hall, John Hunt, Michael D. Jennions

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The immunocompetence handicap hypothesis predicts that male sexual trait expression should be positively correlated with immunocompetence. Here we investigate if immune function in the cricket, Teleogryllus commodus, is related to specific individual components of male sexual signals, as well as to certain multivariate combinations of these components that females most strongly prefer. Male T. commodus produce both advertisement and courtship calls prior to mating. We measured fine-scale structural parameters of both call types and also recorded nightly advertisement calling effort. We then measured two standard indices of immune function: lysozyme-like activity of the haemolymph and haemocyte counts. We found a weak, positive relationship between advertisement calling effort and lysozyme-like activity. There was, however, little evidence that individual structural call components or the net multivariate attractiveness of either call type signalled immune function. The relationships between immunity and sexual signaling did not differ between inbred and outbred males. Our data suggest that it is unlikely that females assess overall male immune function using male calls.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere39631
Number of pages10
JournalPLoS One
Volume7
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Open Access - Access Right Statement

©2012 Drayton et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Keywords

  • Teleogryllus
  • immune system
  • sexual selection

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Sexual signaling and immune function in the black field cricket Teleogryllus commodus'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this