Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Shari'a and multiple modernities in Western Countries: toward a multi-faith pragmatic modern approach rather than a legal pluralist one?

Research output: Chapter in Book / Conference PaperChapter

Abstract

The aim of this chapter is to situate the debate on legal pluralism and Shari'a within Eisenstadt's multiple modernity thesis, and to argue that, to move the matter further, we should work towards a new multi-faith pragmatic modern project. This, as is discussed, fits with Habermas' post-secular project. This multiple modernities theory is tested on the Australian case and it is discovered that while the theory applies to Shari'a and finances, with regard to other personal laws, we are confronted instead with a new conservative modernity. The chapter concludes by proposing that this theory offers a third way between legal pluralism and 'universal' legalism.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe Sociology of Shari’a
Subtitle of host publicationCase Studies from Around the World
EditorsAdam Possamai, James T. Richardson, Bryan S. Turner
PublisherSpringer
Pages325-338
Number of pages14
Edition2nd
ISBN (Electronic)9783031271885
ISBN (Print)9783031271908, 9783031271878
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2023

Publication series

NameBoundaries of Religious Freedom: Regulating Religion in Diverse Societies
ISSN (Print)2214-5281
ISSN (Electronic)2214-529X

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Shari'a and multiple modernities in Western Countries: toward a multi-faith pragmatic modern approach rather than a legal pluralist one?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this