Shortcomings in low-energy x-ray quantification using proportional counters in WDS

Patrick Camus, Ken Moran, Michael Matthews, Richard Wuhrer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Many analytical techniques have had mechanical, electronic, and algorithmic improvements since their introduction, which have led to increased analytical and quantitative performances. The EDS system has been improved by changing the front contact layer of the sensor for superior low-energy x-ray sensitivity, the technology to silicon-drift for increased speed of acquisition, and the window material from Beryllium for low-energy performance [1]. However, the EM Probe (EPMA) wavelength spectroscopy (WDS) has had few improvements with the proportional counter (PC) over the last 60 years, especially for low-energy x-rays (LEX).
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)196-199
Number of pages4
JournalMicroscopy and microanalysis : the official journal of Microscopy Society of America, Microbeam Analysis Society, Microscopical Society of Canada
Volume30
Issue numberSuppl. 1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 24 Jul 2024

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Shortcomings in low-energy x-ray quantification using proportional counters in WDS'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this