Should the non-operative management of appendicitis be the new standard of care?

Robert C. Gandy, Frank Wang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Appendicitis is one of the most commonly encountered emergency presentations to the general surgical services. The operative management of this condition is associated with significant financial costs and represents a significant workload on the emergency surgical services. Negative appendicectomy rates remain high (20–25%) despite advancements in laboratory testing and imaging techniques. Recent data from randomized controlled trials suggests that non-operative management in patients presenting with uncomplicated or non-perforated acute appendicitis is a viable alternative, with only 23% of patients requiring an appendicectomy at 1 year and an overall reduction in complications. In view of this, the traditional teaching of mandatory appendicectomy for all patients with acute appendicitis should be challenged. This article briefly reviews the evidence that supports the use of diagnostic tests to reduce the negative appendicectomy rate and examines the potential selection criteria for non-operative management. The data raises the questions: can a 20–25% negative appendicectomy rate be defended as best practice and can the traditional dogma of early appendicectomy to prevent perforation be supported?
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)228-231
Number of pages4
JournalANZ Journal of Surgery
Volume86
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Keywords

  • appendicitis
  • pain
  • physiology, pathological

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Should the non-operative management of appendicitis be the new standard of care?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this