Small places turned inside-out : social networking in small communities

Tom McDonald, Razvan Nicolescu, Jolynna Sinanan

Research output: Chapter in Book / Conference PaperChapter

Abstract

In smaller communities with small populations"”as opposed to large cities and metropolitan areas"”social life is characterized by a strong sense of mutual familiarity: people knowing (or at least knowing of) one another through extended families, work or vocational networks. This chapter argues that for such "small communities," social relations are relatively more intense and confined, and these dynamics play out in particular ways over uses of social media, where people both conform to norms, expectations and values which they share with others and express their individual opinions and aspirations at the same time, often through careful navigation of private and more public-facing platforms. The findings and illustrations for this chapter are based on 15 months of ethnographic fieldwork, carried out by the authors as part of the Why We Post project, a cross-cultural, comparative study of social media in small towns worldwide conducted by nine anthropologists based at University College London.1 Between 2012 and 2014, McDonald, Nicolescu and Sinanan conducted their fieldwork in rural China, southeast Italy and Trinidad, respectively. All three places were towns that could be classed as "small communities," however the populations of these settlements varied: 20,000 inhabitants in the Italian site, 18,000 in the Trinidadian site and 6,000 in the Chinese site.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe Routledge Companion to Digital Ethnography
EditorsLarissa Hjorth, Heather Horst, Anne Galloway, Genevieve Bell
Place of PublicationU.S.
PublisherRoutledge
Pages89-101
Number of pages13
ISBN (Electronic)9781315673974
ISBN (Print)9781138940918
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Small places turned inside-out : social networking in small communities'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this