So, how did Bourdieu learn to play tennis? : habitus, consciousness and habituation

Greg Noble, Megan Watkins

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    170 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Bourdieu’s development of the notion of ‘habitus’ has proved a rich vein for cultural theory. Habitus has been useful, with the growing interest in processes of embodiment, in countering the cognitive and representational bias in much cultural analysis, and in providing a basis for avoiding the dualisms – of mind and body, structure and agency – that trouble social theory. However, in stressing the unconscious nature of embodiment, and refusing to engage with the question of consciousness, an implicit form of mechanistic determinism has crept into Bourdieu's implementation of habitus. By returning to the Spinozan monism that informs Bourdieu’s work, this paper elaborates a productive conceptualization of habitus that attends to the various intensities of consciousness, the relations between multiple mind-bodies and processes of habituation through a focus on the literature of sports training.
    Original languageEnglish
    Number of pages19
    JournalCultural Studies
    Publication statusPublished - 2003

    Keywords

    • Bourdieu, Pierre, 1930-2002
    • body
    • consciousness
    • habitus

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'So, how did Bourdieu learn to play tennis? : habitus, consciousness and habituation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this