Social cohesion revisited : policy and practice in migrant concentration areas of Sydney and Melbourne

Rachel Sharples, Val Colic-Peisker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper examines the understanding of social cohesion by policymakers, practitioners and residents, with particular reference to migrant concentration areas in Sydney and Melbourne. Ten suburbs we focus on had a high proportion of Muslim Australian residents and were socioeconomically disadvantaged at the time of the 2016 Australian Census. The paper is based on 52 in-depth, semi-structured interviews, mainly with professionals delivering local programmes and services, but also with residents. Based on interview data, the paper seeks to unpack the concept of social cohesion, particularly as it is applied to local programmes and discuss the understandings of the relationship of social cohesion with ethnic diversity and socioeconomic disadvantage. We found that most respondents considered “social cohesion” a positive feature of local and broader society, but the concept was variously understood. The understanding of its relationship with ethnic diversity and socioeconomic status of a local area also varied, but the predominant view was that social cohesion is put under stress by socioeconomic disadvantage. In some cases, “social cohesion” was understood, and criticised, as a coded policy formula for “preventing violent extremism” policies, especially in Muslim concentration areas, therefore with a potential to alienate local communities instead of helping them.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)215-232
Number of pages18
JournalAustralian Journal of Social Issues
Volume57
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2022

Keywords

  • Melbourne (Vic.)
  • Sydney (N.S.W.)
  • cities and towns
  • immigrants
  • multiculturalism
  • social policy
  • social status

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Social cohesion revisited : policy and practice in migrant concentration areas of Sydney and Melbourne'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this