Spatial distribution of fungal communities in a coastal grassland soil

Clare H. Robinson, Timothy M. Szaro, Antonio D. Izzo, Ian C. Anderson, Pamela I. Parkin, Thomas D. Bruns

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    28 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    In grasslands, saprotrophic fungi, including basidiomycetes, are major decomposers of dead organic matter, although spatial distributions of their mycelial assemblages are little described. The aim of this study was to characterise the scale and distribution of saprotrophic fungal communities in a coastal grassland soil using terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP). Soil fungi were sampled at Point Reyes, California, USA, by taking forty-five 26 mm diam. cores in a spatially defined manner. Within each sampled core, complete core sections at 1ââ"šÂ¬Ã¢â‚¬Å“2 cm and 14ââ"šÂ¬Ã¢â‚¬Å“15 cm depths were removed and sub-sampled for DNA extraction and amplification using the primer pairs ITS1F-FAM/ITS4 (general fungi) or ITS1F-FAM/ITS4B (basidiomycete-specific). Nonmetric Multidimensional Scaling showed that general fungal communities could be clearly separated by depth, although basidiomycete communities could not. There were no strong patterns of community similarity or dissimilarity for general or basidiomycete fungal communities at horizontal geographical distances from 25 cm to 96 m in the upper horizon. These results show considerable vertical, but little horizontal, variability in fungal community structure in a semi-natural grassland at the spatial scales measured here.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)414-416
    Number of pages2
    JournalSoil Biology and Biochemistry
    Volume41
    Issue number2
    Publication statusPublished - 2009

    Keywords

    • basidiomycota
    • coastal ecology
    • fungal communities
    • grasslands
    • nucleotide sequence

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Spatial distribution of fungal communities in a coastal grassland soil'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this