TY - JOUR
T1 - Spectral and temporal implementation of Japanese speakers' English vowel categories : a corpus-based study
AU - Yazawa, Kakeru
AU - Konishi, Takayuki
AU - Whang, James
AU - Escudero, Paola
AU - Kondo, Mariko
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Ubiquity Press. All rights reserved.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - This study investigates the predictions of second language (L2) speech acquisition models "” SLM(-r), PAM(-L2), and L2LP "” on how native (L1) Japanese speakers implement the spectral and temporal aspects of L2 American English vowel categories. Data were obtained from 102 L1 Japanese speakers in the J-AESOP corpus, which also includes nativelikeness judgments by trained phoneticians. Spectrally, speakers judged to be non-nativelike showed a strong influence from L1 categories, except L2 // which could be deflected away from L1 /a/ according to SLM(-r) and L2 // which seemed orthographically assimilated to L1 /o/ according to PAM(-L2). More nativelike speakers showed vowel spectra similar to those of native English speakers across all vowels, in accordance with L2LP. Temporally, although speakers tended to equate the phonetic length of English vowels with Japanese phonemic length distinctions, segment-level L1-L2 category similarity was not a significant predictor of the speakers' nativelikeness. Instead, the implementation of prosodic-level factors such as stress and phrase-final lengthening were better predictors. The results highlight the importance of suprasegmental factors in successful category learning and also reveal a weakness in current models of L2 speech acquisition, which focus primarily on the segmental level. Theoretical and pedagogical implications are discussed.
AB - This study investigates the predictions of second language (L2) speech acquisition models "” SLM(-r), PAM(-L2), and L2LP "” on how native (L1) Japanese speakers implement the spectral and temporal aspects of L2 American English vowel categories. Data were obtained from 102 L1 Japanese speakers in the J-AESOP corpus, which also includes nativelikeness judgments by trained phoneticians. Spectrally, speakers judged to be non-nativelike showed a strong influence from L1 categories, except L2 // which could be deflected away from L1 /a/ according to SLM(-r) and L2 // which seemed orthographically assimilated to L1 /o/ according to PAM(-L2). More nativelike speakers showed vowel spectra similar to those of native English speakers across all vowels, in accordance with L2LP. Temporally, although speakers tended to equate the phonetic length of English vowels with Japanese phonemic length distinctions, segment-level L1-L2 category similarity was not a significant predictor of the speakers' nativelikeness. Instead, the implementation of prosodic-level factors such as stress and phrase-final lengthening were better predictors. The results highlight the importance of suprasegmental factors in successful category learning and also reveal a weakness in current models of L2 speech acquisition, which focus primarily on the segmental level. Theoretical and pedagogical implications are discussed.
UR - https://hdl.handle.net/1959.7/uws:69999
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85152740312&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
SN - 1868-6346
VL - 24
SP - 1
EP - 33
JO - Laboratory Phonology
JF - Laboratory Phonology
IS - 1
ER -